0.00/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 1920 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 240 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 02:43:19 EDT 2025 0.14/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.15/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SuOQ8UORJZ/E---3.1_6417.p 0.15/0.46 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA. 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # full_lambda_9 with pid 6498 completed with status 0 0.15/0.46 # Result found by full_lambda_9 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA. 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true) 0.15/0.46 # Search class: HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # new_ho_10 with pid 6499 completed with status 0 0.15/0.46 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA. 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true) 0.15/0.46 # Search class: HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.15/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.46 0.15/0.46 # Proof found! 0.15/0.46 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.46 thf(decl_38, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o). 0.15/0.46 thf(decl_50, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.15/0.46 thf(decl_61, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.15/0.46 thf(decl_73, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.15/0.46 thf(decl_84, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i). 0.15/0.46 thf(decl_88, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.15/0.46 thf(decl_94, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.15/0.46 thf(decl_111, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.15/0.46 thf(ax_022, axiom, ![X29:$i, X30:$o]:(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X29 @ (~((X30))))=>~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X29 @ ((X30)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SuOQ8UORJZ/E---3.1_6417.p', ax_022)). 0.15/0.46 thf(con, conjecture, ?[X15:$i, X24:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X24) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X15)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SuOQ8UORJZ/E---3.1_6417.p', con)). 0.15/0.46 thf(ax_004, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (![X15:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X15)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X15))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SuOQ8UORJZ/E---3.1_6417.p', ax_004)). 0.15/0.46 thf(ax_051, axiom, ![X24:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X24 @ (($true)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SuOQ8UORJZ/E---3.1_6417.p', ax_051)). 0.15/0.46 thf(ax_023, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SuOQ8UORJZ/E---3.1_6417.p', ax_023)). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X29:$i, X30:$o]:(((((X30)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X29 @ $true))&(~(X30)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X29 @ $false)))=>~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X29 @ ((X30))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_022])])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X15:$i, X24:$i]:(((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X15)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X24) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X15)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X24) @ $false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_7, axiom, ((~(![X15:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X15)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X15))))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(![X15:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X15)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X15)))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_004])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X140:$i, X141:$o]:(((((X141)|~(X141)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X140 @ ((X141))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X140 @ $false)|~(X141)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X140 @ ((X141)))))&(((X141)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X140 @ $true)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X140 @ ((X141))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X140 @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X140 @ $true)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X140 @ ((X141))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X142:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X142 @ $true)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax_051])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X134:$i, X135:$i]:((((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X134)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X134))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X135) @ $false)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X134)))&((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X134)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X135) @ $true))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X135) @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X135) @ $true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X137:$i]:(((((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true)))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X137)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X137)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1:$i]:((~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (($true))))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (~($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X1:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X2) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X1:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X1:$i]:(~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (~($true))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_13])])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_18, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_023])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X1:$i]:(~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17])). 0.15/0.46 thf(c_0_20, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.46 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 281 0.15/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 148 0.15/0.46 # Initial clauses : 150 0.15/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6 0.15/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 144 0.15/0.46 # Processed clauses : 90 0.15/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 4 0.15/0.46 # ...subsumed : 4 0.15/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 82 0.15/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.15/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.15/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.15/0.46 # Generated clauses : 1 0.15/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 0.15/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.15/0.46 # Paramodulations : 0 0.15/0.46 # Factorizations : 0 0.15/0.46 # NegExts : 0 0.15/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.15/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.15/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 9 0.15/0.46 # ...of those cached : 5 0.15/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 81 0.15/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 74 0.15/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.15/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 3 0.15/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 4 0.15/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 54 0.15/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 110 0.15/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 1 0.15/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3 0.15/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2 0.15/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.15/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7 0.15/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.15/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.15/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.15/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 90 0.15/0.46 # Condensation successes : 1 0.15/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7575 0.15/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1403 0.15/0.46 0.15/0.46 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.46 # User time : 0.010 s 0.15/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.46 # Total time : 0.013 s 0.15/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 2416 pages 0.15/0.46 0.15/0.46 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.46 # User time : 0.013 s 0.15/0.46 # System time : 0.006 s 0.15/0.46 # Total time : 0.019 s 0.15/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1936 pages 0.15/0.46 % E exiting 0.15/0.47 % E exiting 0.15/0.47 EOF